arXiv MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_papersC | Search for papers on arXiv by various criteria |
| get_paperC | Get details about a specific paper by its arXiv ID |
| search_by_categoryC | Search for papers in a specific arXiv category |
| get_paper_contentC | Get the full text content of a paper by downloading and extracting text from its PDF |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The tools are mostly distinct, with clear separation between getting paper details, extracting content, and two search methods. However, the two search tools (search_by_category and search_papers) could potentially cause some confusion as both involve searching, though their specific purposes (category-based vs. general criteria) are clarified in descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive naming. Each name starts with an action verb (get, search) followed by a specific noun or phrase, maintaining uniformity throughout the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for an arXiv server, covering core operations like retrieval and search. It might be slightly lean, as additional tools for advanced filtering or metadata could enhance coverage, but it's well-scoped for basic functionality.
The tool set covers essential arXiv operations: retrieving paper details and content, and searching by category or criteria. Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for listing categories, handling paper versions, or user-specific features like favorites, but core workflows are adequately supported.