Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
namecheap-webui-mcp

namecheap-webui-mcp

by Microck
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

namecheap_webui_status

Verify the authentication status of your Namecheap account on the web dashboard.

Instructions

Check whether the saved Namecheap auth state is logged in.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "namecheap_webui_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
headedNoRun with a visible browser window.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool checks login status but does not disclose whether it makes a network request, what happens if not logged in, or any side effects. Lacks detail on behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Could include more detail without undue length, but for a simple check it is efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has one optional parameter and no output schema. Description fails to explain the return value format (e.g., boolean, status text). Without output schema, description should specify what the agent can expect as a result, making it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (one parameter 'headed' fully described in schema). Description does not mention the parameter, so it adds no value beyond schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Check whether the saved Namecheap auth state is logged in' uses a specific verb ('check') and resource ('saved Namecheap auth state'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like namecheap_webui_login (which performs login) and namecheap_webui_query (which queries data).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., namecheap_webui_login or namecheap_webui_query). The purpose implies it's for checking login status before other operations, but no when-not or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools