Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
namecheap-webui-mcp

namecheap-webui-mcp

by Microck
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

namecheap_webui_query

Retrieve a text snapshot of Namecheap dashboard views for account, domains, hosting, and more without using an API key.

Instructions

Open a Namecheap dashboard view and return a text snapshot.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "view": "<view>"
    },
    "name": "namecheap_webui_query"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
viewYesWhich Namecheap view to open.
domainNameNoRequired when view is advanced-dns or domain-manage.
headedNoRun with a visible browser window.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks disclosure of behavioral traits. It does not mention that the tool likely requires a prior login session (via namecheap_webui_login), whether it modifies state, or any side effects. Without annotations, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core action. It is not verbose, though it omits important details that could be added without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (conditional parameter, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the return value format or the conditions for domainName. This forces the agent to infer from the schema, which is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool opens a Namecheap dashboard view and returns a text snapshot, which distinguishes it from sibling tools that perform domain or DNS operations. However, 'text snapshot' is somewhat vague regarding its content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., needing to log in first) or situations where other tools might be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools