Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
namecheap-webui-mcp

namecheap-webui-mcp

by Microck
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

namecheap_domain_get_overview

Retrieves domain overview details such as registrar, nameservers, and expiry date from the management page.

Instructions

Get overview details from a domain's Domain Manage page.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "domainName": "<domainName>"
    },
    "name": "namecheap_domain_get_overview"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainNameYesFull domain name, for example example.com
headedNoRun with a visible browser window.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description does not disclose what 'overview details' include, whether the tool performs a read operation, or any behavior beyond the parameter descriptions. The headed parameter hints at browser automation but the description doesn't clarify if this is a scraping operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no filler. However, it is under-specified but still efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description lacks detail on what the 'overview details' encompass. Given the complexity of domain management pages, the description is insufficient for an agent to understand what information will be returned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with clear descriptions for both parameters. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves overview details from the domain's manage page. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that focus on specific components like DNS records or features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites or conditions under which this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools