pwndbg_run

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Given no annotations, the description adequately discloses blocking execution, progress streaming, and timeout behavior. It adds context about intermediate output and the stopping conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three short sections, front-loaded with the action, and every sentence adds necessary information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple run tool with an output schema, the description covers the essential behavioral aspects: starting condition, blocking behavior, progress notifications, and timeout. It is complete enough for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds explanations for both parameters—session_id as a session UUID and timeout with default. This compensates well beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs the loaded program from the beginning. It uses specific verbs and distinguishes from other execution tools like 'pwndbg_run_until_stop' by specifying the starting point, though it does not explicitly contrast.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It implies usage context by describing blocking behavior and timeout, but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool over siblings or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.