as_logs_ide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return format (JSON with 'log' and source path) beyond the readOnlyHint annotation, and no contradictions are present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct, front-loaded with the main action, and uses clear formatting for args and returns with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tail-log tool with strong annotations and an output schema, the description covers the essential behavioral and return information completely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions 'lines' and 'level' with examples, but the input schema already provides complete descriptions. Thus no additional meaning is added, meeting the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns the tail of Android Studio's idea.log with optional level filtering, distinguishing it from related tools like as_adb_logcat and as_logs_mcp.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives such as as_adb_logcat or as_logs_mcp, leaving the agent to infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.