as_gradle_dependencies

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true, indicating a safe, idempotent operation. The description adds that the tool returns a JSON string in command.stdout, which is consistent and slightly more specific, but does not disclose additional behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence to state the purpose and a compact list for parameters and return value. Every part contributes meaningfully with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only tool with 4 parameters and an existing output schema, the description covers the essential action, parameters, and return format. It is nearly complete; however, the output schema is not explicitly detailed, but the description mentions the return is a JSON string.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description lists the parameters (project_dir, module, configuration, timeout) with brief explanations that mostly echo the schema's own descriptions. It does not add significant new meaning beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'prints the dependency tree for a module', which is a specific action on a specific resource (Gradle dependencies). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like as_gradle_tasks or as_gradle_assemble, which handle different Gradle operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for inspecting dependencies but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as as_gradle_lint or as_gradle_signing_report. There is no mention of context or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.