as_gradle_lint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, indicating safety. The description adds that it returns JSON status and report paths but doesn't elaborate on behavioral traits like file modifications or Gradle sync requirements. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two clear sections: purpose, then Args/Returns. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema existence, the description adequately covers return structure (JSON with status and report paths) and report location pattern. Slightly vague on timeout default but otherwise complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage according to context, so the description partially compensates by listing the parameter fields (project_dir, timeout) and their types. However, it lacks detail on default values or constraints beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Run Android Lint via Gradle and point to the generated reports,' which is a specific verb-resource pair. It distinguishes from sibling Gradle tools like assemble or test.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for running lint and viewing reports but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other gradle tools) or when not to use it. No exclusion criteria provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.