wavexis_uncheck

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and readOnlyHint=false, which align with the uncheck action. The description adds minimal context beyond stating the return format ('JSON string with status ok'). It does not elaborate on side effects or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, with no extraneous words. However, it could be slightly more informative without adding length, such as mentioning the element types. Overall, it is appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple uncheck action, the description is minimally adequate. It does not differentiate from sibling 'wavexis_check' or mention common usage patterns. With annotations present and a basic output schema implied, the description lacks some contextual details but is not severely deficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description only says 'input: Uncheck parameters', adding no explanation beyond the schema. The schema itself has minimal descriptions for 'selector' (only title) and 'session_id' (empty description). Given 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate but fails to clarify parameter usage or formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Uncheck a checkbox' with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not explicitly mention that it also works on radio buttons, which is only indicated in the schema. Sibling tool 'wavexis_check' exists for the opposite action, but the description does not differentiate beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'wavexis_check'. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as requiring an active session or the element being present. The description lacks any usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.