Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to WaveXisMCP

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    Not graded
    maintenance
    Enables browser automation through Playwright using accessibility tree snapshots instead of screenshots. Supports web scraping, form interactions, testing, and connecting to existing browser sessions with logged-in accounts.
    23
    7,762 npm
    5
    -

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A browser automation MCP server providing 30 tools for navigation, interaction, page information, state checks, tab management, and more, enabling natural language control of browsers via MCP-compatible clients.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A browser automation MCP server with stealth mode, profile management, and multi-browser support, enabling LLMs to control browsers for tasks like navigation, data extraction, and form filling.
    7 npm
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that enables AI agents to control Chrome via DevTools CDP and accessibility trees, providing 21 tools for browser automation including tab management, navigation, interactions, and page capture.
    -
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides browser automation capabilities, enabling LLMs to control a web browser for navigation, interaction, and data extraction.
    32
    1,331 npm
    14
    MIT
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A professional browser automation server that enables MCP clients to perform structured web navigation, element interaction, and data extraction using the DrissionPage framework. It features 14 deterministic tools optimized for LLMs to automate web workflows efficiently without relying on vision-based models.
    69
    487
    Apache 2.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 72 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Many tools are clearly differentiated (dom_* vs iframe_* vs shadow_*), but several clusters overlap: close_tab/close_page, cookies_get/cookie_list/cookie_get, key_press/press_keys/key_down/key_up, and pdf/page_pdf. The cross-references help, but an agent has to carefully parse the differences among 72 tools, and some boundaries are genuinely unclear.

Naming Consistency3/5

The wavexis_ prefix and snake_case run throughout, and groups like dom_*, iframe_*, and shadow_* are consistent. However, conventions are mixed across the set: bare verbs (navigate, click, wait), noun_verb (cookies_get, dom_get), verb_noun (list_tabs, set_files), and odd pairs like key_press/press_keys and cookie_list/cookies_get.

Tool Count1/5

72 tools is far beyond the typical well-scoped 3–15 range and falls into the extreme category. Even for a broad browser automation server, this many entry points creates meaningful selection overhead and redundancy rather than earning each tool's place.

Completeness5/5

The surface covers the full browser lifecycle: sessions, tabs, navigation, DOM, iframes/shadow DOM, input, cookies, captures, and an invoke escape hatch for backend methods. It is hard to identify a significant missing operation for automation tasks.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessWithin a week