wavexis_close_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the action is destructive and irreversible, which aligns with annotations. It also adds useful context that the session remains active for other tabs. This goes beyond the annotations by clarifying side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and includes side effects and return value efficiently. Slightly verbose but generally concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, side effects, and return format. While it omits prerequisites (e.g., session must exist), the required session_id parameter implies that. Complete enough for a simple resource-freeing tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema description coverage is listed as 0%, the description explains the tab_id parameter's behavior (optional, default current page). It does not elaborate on session_id, but the schema's required field and title suffice.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that it closes a browser page/tab by target id or current page, which is specific and actionable. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'wavexis_close_tab', which may cause confusion about when to use which.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions using it to free resources and notes compatibility with Playwright's API, but fails to provide explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives (e.g., wavexis_close_tab) or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.