Retrieve details of a specific message in ProPresenter by providing its ID, enabling access to presentation content for automation and control.
Get details of a specific message
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| messageId | Yes | The ID of the message |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states 'Get details of a specific message' without disclosing behaviors like read-only nature, error handling for missing IDs, auth requirements, or response structure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no unnecessary words. Highly concise for a simple retrieval operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks behavioral details and return value specification (no output schema). For a simple tool it is partially adequate, but missing transparency reduces completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with 'messageId' explained by the schema description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, meeting baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'details of a specific message,' clearly distinguishing from siblings like 'messages_get_all' that retrieve multiple messages.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., 'messages_get_all'), no mention of prerequisites like messageId availability, and no exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.