audio_trigger_focused_next
Advance to the next item in the currently focused playlist within ProPresenter presentations.
Instructions
Trigger the next item in the focused playlist
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Advance to the next item in the currently focused playlist within ProPresenter presentations.
Trigger the next item in the focused playlist
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states it 'Trigger's the next item. It fails to disclose behavioral traits such as whether it changes state, side effects, or idempotency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant information. It is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters or output schema, the description adequately explains the core action. However, it could be more complete by clarifying the prerequisite that a playlist must be focused, though the tool name implies this.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so the description adds essential meaning by specifying what action is taken (triggering the next item). The term 'next' is clear in context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Trigger' and the resource 'next item in the focused playlist', distinguishing it from siblings that target previous items or active playlists.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like audio_trigger_focused_previous or audio_trigger_active_next. No context is given for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.