create_email_organization

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses side effect (sends verification email) and idempotency behavior (duplicate emails return existing org). Without annotations, adequately covers key behavioral aspects for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences front-loaded with purpose, followed by side effect and idempotency. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains behavior, side effect, and idempotency. Could mention return format or error cases but overall sufficient given tool simplicity and single parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with parameter 'email' described. Description adds no further param semantics beyond schema, placing score at baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool creates an email-based organization with explicit constraints (Stripe-only, no wallet). Distinguishes from sibling 'create_org' which likely handles wallet-based orgs, and 'link_wallet_to_organization'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates usage for Stripe-only, email-verified organizations. Implicitly distinguishes from wallet-based alternatives but lacks explicit exclusion of other org creation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.