Resume Key Value instance

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false (mutation) and destructiveHint=false. The description adds the HTTP method and endpoint, but does not disclose additional behavioral traits like state expectations (e.g., must be suspended first) or idempotency behavior. Given annotations, the description provides modest added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, fairly concise. The first sentence is slightly redundant with the title, but the overall structure is clear and front-loaded with the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate but could be more complete. It does not explain prerequisites (e.g., instance must be suspended) or side effects. With no schema descriptions, the description should compensate, but it falls short.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameter description (0% coverage), and the description merely says 'by ID' without clarifying what 'redisId' represents (e.g., 'the ID of the Key Value instance to resume'). No added semantic meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Resume), resource (Key Value instance), and the specific API endpoint. It distinguishes from siblings like 'render_suspend_key_value' and other resume tools for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'render_suspend_key_value' for suspension, other resume tools for different resources). The context implies its use, but the description lacks explicit when/when-not statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.