Remove resources from environment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds the specific API endpoint, confirming the destructive nature. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, resource recovery options, or dependency handling beyond what annotations indicate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences, but the first sentence is redundant with the title. It is front-loaded but lacks meaningful detail that justifies its length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature, lack of output schema, and minimal annotation detail, the description is inadequate. It does not explain the effects of removal, allowed resource types, or any constraints. More detail is needed for safe and correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, yet the description fails to explain the two required parameters ('environmentId' and 'resourceIds'). It only vaguely mentions 'with the provided ID', which is insufficient for an agent to construct the correct call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('remove resources from environment') and the target resource. It specifies that it uses a DELETE API call, which differentiates it from sibling tools like 'render_add_resources_to_environment' and other delete tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for removing resources from an environment but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to delete individual resources instead. The API call hint is present but insufficient for clear decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.