Skip to main content
Glama

Remove workspace member

render_remove_workspace_member
DestructiveIdempotent

Remove a user from a workspace on Render. Provide the workspace owner ID and user ID to delete the membership via the Render API.

Instructions

Remove workspace member. Remove a user from the specified workspace. Calls DELETE /owners/{ownerId}/members/{userId} on the Render Public API.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
userIdYesThe ID of the user (Render object ID with a `usr-` prefix).
ownerIdYesThe ID of the workspace to return resources for
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the API endpoint call, which provides some behavioral context beyond annotations (destructiveHint=true). However, it does not elaborate on irreversible consequences or auth requirements. Given annotations cover destructiveness, this is adequate but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and to the point (3 sentences). The first sentence slightly repeats the title but overall is efficient. No unnecessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic purpose and API call. For a simple tool with no output schema and only 2 required params, it is fairly complete. However, it omits potential error conditions or prerequisites, leaving room for improvement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description does not add additional parameter semantics beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove workspace member') and the specific resource ('Remove a user from the specified workspace'). It also references the exact API endpoint, making it unambiguous. This distinguishes it from siblings like 'update_workspace_member'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lacks guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as permissions needed or prerequisites. No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use advice is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LuSrodri/render-useful-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server