ABB RobotStudio MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to ABB RobotStudio MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for controlling Universal Robots arms and Robotiq grippers via RTDE protocol, enabling motion, force, I/O, and gripper operations.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional that enables AI assistants to read model data, loads, and analysis results from an open Robot session, with optional write and calculation tools.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for ROS 2 environments that connects via rosbridge WebSocket, enabling topic/service introspection, publish/subscribe, service calls, robot connectivity checks, and polishing pipeline operations.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for controlling a simulated robot arm with vision-based pick-and-place, driven by LLM or manual control.1-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for COMSOL Multiphysics simulation automation via AI agents.781MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI assistants to Siemens TIA Portal via the Openness API. AI-assisted PLC programming, project management, hardware configuration, cross-reference analysis, and deployment. 19 tools, 230 actions.35-
TDQS
Scored across 53 tools
Tools are clearly grouped by prefix (rs_ for RobotStudio SDK, rws_ for Robot Web Services), which helps an agent differentiate between simulation and real controller operations. However, some functions like rs_controller_status and rws_controller_status overlap in purpose, though descriptions clarify the different access methods.
All tools consistently use snake_case with the rs_ or rws_ prefix. Verbs such as get, set, read, write, start, stop are uniformly applied, making the naming predictable and easy to follow.
53 tools is a high count, but it is justified by the dual nature of the server covering both RobotStudio simulation and RWS real controller operations. Each sub-domain has a reasonable number of tools for its complexity, though the total might be slightly overwhelming for an agent.
The tool set covers a broad range of operations: station management, simulation control, path/target manipulation, I/O, file system, program execution, and variable reading/writing via both SDK and RWS. Minor gaps like deployment or user management are acceptable given the focus on programming and control.