A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for Korean law data (statutes, precedents, regulations) with citation verification, impact analysis, and time comparison tools.
10
5,132 npm
2,595
MIT
legal-search-mcp
by LimEulYoung
Related Servers
Alternatives to legal-search-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean legal research, offering access to statutes, precedents, administrative rules, citation verification, and legal analysis through 10 tools.105,132 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Korean National Law Information. Enables searching and retrieving Korean laws, English-translated laws, administrative rules, court precedents, and constitutional decisions via 54 MCP tools.54-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides Korean legal information through 10 tools, including statutes, precedents, administrative rules, and citation verification with hallucination prevention, enabling legal research and analysis via AI assistants or CLI.105,132 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying Korean firefighter public data and fire-related laws/precedents. Provides tools to search fire/EMS statistics, fire facility information, and legal texts.724 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing comprehensive Korean legal data access (laws, precedents, regulations, ordinances) with citation verification, temporal comparison, impact graphs, and legal research workflows.105,132 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.4/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource: precedents, statutes, empirical sentencing data, and guideline-based range calculation. The sentencing pair is explicitly differentiated, with compute_sentencing_range producing guideline ranges and sentence_statistics providing real case distributions.
Naming Consistency3/5
All names are lowercase snake_case and readable, but they mix conventions: precedent_search and statute_lookup are object+verb, sentence_statistics is a noun phrase, and compute_sentencing_range is verb+object. The pattern is not predictable enough for an agent to infer a new tool's name.
Tool Count5/5
Four tools is well-scoped for a legal research and sentencing assistant. Each tool is broad and complex enough to justify its place, with no redundant tools.
Completeness2/5
The set covers statutes and sentencing well, but precedent_search explicitly instructs callers to continue with precedent_dive, which is not exposed in the tool list. This creates a dead end for full-text precedent access and is a significant gap for the stated legal-research purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues