responsive_breakpoint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations and a description that is merely a label, no behavioral traits (e.g., side effects, authorization needs, or output) are disclosed. The tool's behavior remains opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one phrase) but sacrifices clarity and completeness. A tool description should provide context, not just a label.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given nested objects in the schema and no output schema, the description fails to explain what results the tool produces or how to interpret the configuration. It is incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the descriptions are minimal and the tool description adds no extra meaning. Baseline 3 applies as the schema already documents parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a noun phrase ('响应式断点动画' meaning 'responsive breakpoint animation') without a verb, leaving the tool's action unclear. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like generate_scroll_animation or responsive_scaling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description offers no context regarding appropriate scenarios or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.