get_plugin_status
Check plugin status and generate a report. Optionally request a detailed report for in-depth information.
Instructions
获取插件状态报告
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| detailed | No | 详细报告 |
Check plugin status and generate a report. Optionally request a detailed report for in-depth information.
获取插件状态报告
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| detailed | No | 详细报告 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must bear full burden. It only states 'get plugin status report' without disclosing side effects, permissions, or what the status entails. This is insufficient for a tool that likely performs a read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, no wasted words, and fits the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing details about return values, error conditions, or whether the report is real-time. For a tool with no output schema, more context is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter 'detailed' is described in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning; it is baseline adequate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'get' and resource 'plugin status report', making the purpose evident. However, it does not distinguish from the sibling 'manage_gsap_plugins' which might also report on plugin status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'manage_gsap_plugins'. The description lacks context about prerequisites or use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Lillard01/GSAP-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server