create_stagger_animation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Create stagger animation effect' without mentioning that staggering applies sequential delays to multiple targets, or any side effects, permissions, or response details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase with no wasted words, making it concise. However, it lacks structure (no full sentence) and is very minimal, which earns a 4 rather than 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested 'properties' object, no output schema, many siblings), the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, the staggering mechanism, or how parameters interact.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 75% (most parameters have Chinese descriptions). The description itself adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so it meets the baseline for moderate coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is a single phrase '创建交错动画效果' (Create stagger animation effect), which states the verb and resource but is vague about what a stagger animation entails. It does not distinguish this tool from sibling animation tools like create_keyframe_animation or create_timeline_animation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description lacks context about prerequisites or scenarios where stagger animation is appropriate compared to other animation types.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.