audio_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions that no external audio files are needed and lists parameters, but it does not disclose side effects like file overwriting, permission requirements, or error behaviors. The description is adequate but missing key behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: a brief purpose statement, a bullet list of presets, and an Args section. It is relatively concise while containing necessary information. Minor redundancy like repeating 'preset' could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, 1 required, and an output schema exists, the description covers the purpose, available presets, parameter details, and return value. It is fairly complete, though it could mention overwrite behavior on output_path and potential errors for invalid presets.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% parameter description coverage, meaning the schema only provides names and types. The description compensates fully by providing an 'Args' section with detailed explanations for each parameter, including preset list, absolute path requirement, pitch options, duration in seconds, and intensity range. This adds significant meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates preset sound design elements and lists available categories, making the tool's purpose clear. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like audio_synthesize, which could also generate audio.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for predefined presets but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as audio_compose or audio_synthesize. No when-not or exclusion criteria are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.