translate_readme

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Only one behavioral trait disclosed: preserving structure. No information on expected side effects (e.g., file modification, required permissions, error handling, or format preservation beyond markdown). With no annotations, description falls short.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no extraneous information. Immediately conveys core purpose and constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and 5 parameters, description lacks critical context: output format (e.g., returns translated text, writes to file?), behavior on errors, and prerequisites (e.g., network access, API keys). Incomplete for a translation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning or interaction details (e.g., mutual exclusivity of formal/informal, or effect of provider choice). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Translate', specific resource 'README markdown file', and key constraint 'preserving structure'. Distinguishes from sibling 'translate_markdown' which is more general, and other specific tools like 'translate_api_docs'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as translate_markdown or batch_translate_locales. No mention of prerequisites or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.