verified_create_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses the verification and folder assignment persistence steps, but does not detail failure handling, retries, or what 'verified' means. With no annotations, more context on side effects and limits would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences plus metadata. Front-loaded with the core purpose, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the main functionality and provides auth and related tool hints. However, missing details on return values, error states, and parameter meanings leave gaps for a tool with 5 parameters and no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameter descriptions in the schema (0% coverage), and the description does not explain any parameter beyond hints from name and context. 'color', 'kind', 'view_mode' remain unclear to agents.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool creates a project and then verifies its existence and folder assignment if requested. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'create_project' and 'verified_assign_project_folder'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides related tools and auth hints, indicating when to use different auth flows. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over its siblings e.g., 'create_project' for simpler cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.