Skip to main content
Glama

move_tasks

Moves tasks between projects and automatically cascades to child tasks to prevent orphaned subtasks.

Instructions

Move tasks between projects via V2 batch.

[Category: Tasks — Batch]  [Auth: V2]
[Related: batch_update_tasks, list_projects, set_subtask_parent]

⚠️ ORPHAN TRAP — The V2 API moves tasks individually, never cascading to children.
Moving a parent task leaves its subtasks stranded in the old project.
The parent-child relationship (parentId/childIds) is preserved in the metadata,
but TickTick won't display subtasks correctly if they're in a different project.

This tool automatically detects and cascades to children:
For each unique source project, it fetches the full project data once via
/project/{id}/data (which correctly returns childIds, unlike /project/{id}/task/{id}).
A {task_id: childIds} index is built per source project — O(1) API calls per project,
not per task. Children are appended to the move batch automatically (same destination).
The returned dict includes `cascaded_children` listing any auto-added child moves.

Args:
    moves: List of {"taskId": "...", "fromProjectId": "...", "toProjectId": "..."}.
        Only provide parent tasks — children are fetched and moved automatically.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
movesYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses the critical behavioral trait of automatically cascading children to avoid orphan subtasks. It explains the internal optimization (O(1) API calls per project) and the returned dict including cascaded_children. This far exceeds basic transparency expectations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections (purpose, warning, cascade explanation, args). It front-loads the main purpose and critical warning. However, it is slightly verbose in explaining the internal mechanics, which could be trimmed without losing value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description thoroughly covers input behavior and the automatic child cascade. However, it does not fully describe the return value beyond mentioning cascaded_children, nor does it specify error handling or rate limits. Given the absence of an output schema, this is a notable gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description compensates by detailing the moves argument structure (taskId, fromProjectId, toProjectId) and instructing users to provide only parent tasks. This adds essential meaning beyond the schema's generic object definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool moves tasks between projects via V2 batch, with the specific verb 'move' and resource 'tasks'. It distinguishes itself from siblings like batch_update_tasks by highlighting the automatic child cascade, making its purpose unique.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for use: when moving parent tasks, as it handles the orphan trap. It lists related tools (batch_update_tasks, list_projects, set_subtask_parent) but lacks explicit when-not-to-use scenarios, though the behavioral warning implies when to prefer this over raw V2.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KpihX/tick-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server