Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to napcat-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to bridge with QQ via NapCat/OneBot 11, allowing whitelisted private messages to reach an agent with full tool access while group mentions are answered by a sandboxed pure LLM without system access.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI clients to send and receive QQ messages through NapCatQQ (OneBot v11) for both private and group chats. It supports message context management, real-time WebSocket listening, and human-like typing simulation.
      7
      25
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects QQ via NapCat OneBot v11 to an Astral Code app-server, exposing MCP tools for sending messages, files, images, and fetching conversation history.
      10
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A MCP server that exposes QQ bot capabilities over Streamable HTTP, enabling clients to query bot status, read group and friend info, fetch chat history, and send group/private text messages.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with NapCat QQ bot APIs for group management, messaging, and system operations. Supports HTTP and WebSocket modes with security features like group restrictions and readonly mode.
      57
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight Node.js MCP server that integrates Alibaba Cloud's Qwen models, providing vision understanding, real-time web search, and general chat capabilities through three ready-to-use tools.
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, with clear descriptions separating group management, messaging, and file operations. The main overlap is send_msg versus send_group_msg/send_private_msg, but the descriptions explicitly clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: set_group_*, get_group_*, send_*, get_*. Minor deviations like fetch_custom_face do not break the overall predictability.

    Tool Count2/5

    45 tools is a very large surface for an MCP server. While the domain is broad, the number will create significant selection overhead for agents, and many related operations could be consolidated or grouped.

    Completeness4/5

    Core messaging, group management, member info, and file retrieval are well covered. Notable gaps include no way to approve/reject group requests fetched via get_group_system_msg and no file upload capability, but these are not fatal for typical bot workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues