React Native Upgrade Helper MCP Server
Automates the React Native Upgrade Helper to extract upgrade information and file diffs between React Native versions, helping with React Native app upgrades.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@React Native Upgrade Helper MCP ServerWhat do I need to change to upgrade from 0.70.14 to 0.74.0?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
React Native Upgrade Helper MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that automates the React Native Upgrade Helper website to extract upgrade information between React Native versions.
What It Does
This MCP server uses Playwright to automatically:
Fill out the React Native Upgrade Helper form with your version details
Extract comprehensive upgrade information including file diffs
Return structured JSON data that AI assistants can use to help with React Native upgrades
Related MCP server: React Native MCP Server
Installation
Clone and install dependencies:
git clone <repository-url>
cd react-native-upgrade-helper-mcp
npm installInstall Playwright browser:
npx playwright install chromiumBuild the project:
npm run buildConfiguration
Add this server to your MCP client configuration:
Claude Code
Add to ~/.config/claude-code/mcp_servers.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"react-native-upgrade-helper": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/react-native-upgrade-helper-mcp/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Claude Desktop
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"react-native-upgrade-helper": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/react-native-upgrade-helper-mcp/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Cursor
Add to your MCP settings:
{
"servers": {
"react-native-upgrade-helper": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/react-native-upgrade-helper-mcp/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Important: Replace /absolute/path/to/react-native-upgrade-helper-mcp/ with the actual absolute path to this project directory.
Usage
The server provides two tools:
1. get_upgrade_info
Get comprehensive upgrade information between React Native versions.
Parameters:
fromVersion(required): Source React Native version (e.g., "0.70.14")toVersion(required): Target React Native version (e.g., "0.74.0")packageName(optional): Package name (default: "com.example.app")projectName(optional): Project name (default: "ExampleApp")
Example:
@react-native-upgrade-helper get_upgrade_info fromVersion=0.70.14 toVersion=0.74.02. get_file_diff
Get specific file differences for the upgrade.
Parameters:
fromVersion(required): Source React Native versiontoVersion(required): Target React Native versionfileName(required): Specific file to get diff for (e.g., "package.json")packageName(optional): Package name (default: "com.example.app")projectName(optional): Project name (default: "ExampleApp")
Example:
@react-native-upgrade-helper get_file_diff fromVersion=0.70.14 toVersion=0.74.0 fileName=package.jsonExample AI Prompts
Once configured, you can ask your AI assistant:
"Help me upgrade my React Native app from 0.70.14 to 0.74.0. What changes do I need to make?"
"Show me the specific changes needed for package.json when upgrading to RN 0.74.0"
"What are the breaking changes when upgrading from React Native 0.70 to 0.74?"
Output Format
get_upgrade_info returns:
{
"fromVersion": "0.70.14",
"toVersion": "0.74.0",
"packageName": "com.example.app",
"projectName": "ExampleApp",
"url": "https://react-native-community.github.io/upgrade-helper/",
"summary": "Upgrade summary information",
"breakingChanges": ["Breaking change descriptions"],
"fileChanges": [
{
"fileName": "package.json",
"changeType": "modified",
"hasChanges": true,
"content": "diff content..."
}
],
"totalFiles": 15,
"modifiedFiles": 12,
"addedFiles": 2,
"deletedFiles": 1
}get_file_diff returns:
{
"fromVersion": "0.70.14",
"toVersion": "0.74.0",
"fileName": "package.json",
"changeType": "modified",
"diff": "actual diff content...",
"found": true
}Development
# Run in development mode
npm run dev
# Build for production
npm run build
# Test the server manually
echo '{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": 1, "method": "tools/list", "params": {}}' | node dist/index.jsTroubleshooting
Playwright issues: Ensure Chromium is installed:
npx playwright install chromiumPermission errors: Make sure the script is executable:
chmod +x dist/index.jsPath issues: Always use absolute paths in MCP configuration files.
Network timeouts: The server waits 15 seconds for page loads. For slower connections, modify the timeout in src/index.ts.
License
MIT License
Available Tools
2 toolsget_file_diffGet Specific File DiffB
Get specific file differences for React Native upgrade
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fileName | Yes | Specific file to get diff for (e.g., "package.json", "android/build.gradle") | |
| toVersion | Yes | Target React Native version | |
| fromVersion | Yes | Source React Native version | |
| packageName | No | Package name | com.example.app |
| projectName | No | Project name | ExampleApp |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
There are no annotations provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. However, it only states 'Get specific file differences' without explaining what the diff looks like, whether it's read-only, or any potential side effects. This is a significant gap in a tool with no annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the purpose without any filler or redundancy. It is appropriately concise for its simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and no annotations, the description needs to explain return values and behavioral context, but it does not. Given the tool has 5 parameters and one sibling, the description is too lean to be considered adequately complete, especially since it doesn't clarify what the diff output looks like or how it differs from get_upgrade_info.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides 100% coverage with descriptions for all parameters, so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what the schema already offers. Baseline of 3 is appropriate when schema coverage is high.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'get' and resource 'specific file differences', clearly indicating it retrieves diffs for a particular file. The phrase 'for React Native upgrade' adds context, and it distinguishes from the sibling tool get_upgrade_info, which presumably handles general upgrade information.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage in the React Native upgrade process, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus get_upgrade_info or any exclusions. It provides minimal usage context but no direct alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_upgrade_infoGet React Native Upgrade InformationC
Extract React Native upgrade information between two versions
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| toVersion | Yes | Target React Native version (e.g., "0.74.0") | |
| fromVersion | Yes | Source React Native version (e.g., "0.70.14") | |
| packageName | No | Package name for the project | com.example.app |
| projectName | No | Project name | ExampleApp |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavioral traits. 'Extract' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or what the output represents. The agent is left guessing about the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no fluff, making it concise and easy to parse. It front-loads the primary action and resource. However, it is perhaps too terse given the tool's complexity, though this does not hurt conciseness itself.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is not complete for a tool with 4 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema. It fails to explain what 'upgrade information' entails, what the return format is, or any prerequisites. An agent cannot fully understand the tool's behavior or expected results from the description alone.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters are already documented in the input schema. The description adds minimal semantic value beyond restating 'between two versions' which corresponds to the fromVersion and toVersion parameters. The optional parameters packageName and projectName are not mentioned in the description but are fully covered in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Extract') and names the resource ('React Native upgrade information') with the scoping 'between two versions'. It is clear about the core function, though it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling get_file_diff, which likely serves a different purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no context about when it is appropriate to invoke. There is no mention of when not to use it or how it relates to get_file_diff.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
get_file_diff - First observed
get_upgrade_info
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have distinct purposes: one provides high-level upgrade information between versions, the other retrieves specific file diffs. No overlap or confusion in their intended use.
Both tools use a consistent 'get_' prefix followed by a noun phrase in snake_case ('upgrade_info', 'file_diff'), establishing a clear naming pattern.
With only two tools, the server feels minimal for the stated purpose of upgrade assistance. While it's a focused set, it's on the borderline of being too thin, as a typical upgrade helper might require more granular operations.
The toolset lacks a way to discover which files changed between versions, making get_file_diff difficult to use without external knowledge. Additionally, there is no tool to list available React Native versions, creating a notable gap that could cause agent failures.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Check exact npm/PyPI upgrades for evidence-backed breaking changes; query APIs and components.
Translates a lockfile diff into a human-readable upgrade plan for npm, PyPI, and GitHub Actions.
Fetch web pages and extract exactly the content you need. Select elements with CSS and retrieve co…
Web scraping for AI agents. Converts URLs to clean, LLM-ready Markdown with anti-bot bypass.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExtracts diffs from GitHub Pull Requests, allowing users to retrieve and analyze changes between branches in a repository.4282ISC
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides comprehensive tools for React Native development, automating project initialization, version management, upgrades, Expo integration, and development workflows through AI assistance.22621MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for React Native Upgrade Helper diffs. It fetches the same generated template diffs used by React Native Upgrade Helper, backed by react-native-community/rn-diff-purge, and exposes them as MCP tools that agents can call directly.514MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceTransforms code diffs into beautiful visual comparisons with support for GitHub Gist sharing and local file output (HTML/PNG).2112MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KalinYorgov/RN-upgrade-helper-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server