Remove athletes from group

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, and the description's 'Remove' is consistent with that. However, the description adds no extra behavioral context beyond what annotations provide, such as whether removal is permanent or how non-existent athletes are handled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose without any filler. It is well-structured and ideal for quick parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (two fully described parameters, no output schema, and clear annotations), the description is complete enough for an agent to correctly invoke it. The behavior is straightforward and well-covered by the schema, annotations, and sibling context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters are fully described in the schema (group_id as 'Group (tag) ID' and athlete_ids as 'Athlete IDs to remove'), so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no further parameter meaning, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and the target resource ('athletes from a group'), with scope ('one or more'). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like tp_add_athletes_to_group or tp_list_athletes_in_group.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidelines are given about when to use this tool versus alternatives. The name and sibling context imply usage for removing athletes, but the description does not state exclusions or mention alternatives, leaving it to the agent to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.