Explorar cualquier página del aula por URL

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that it downloads pages with the active session, returns content, and is restricted to the host. It implies read-only behavior but does not mention potential rate limits or what happens if the session is expired. Still, it provides adequate transparency for a fetch tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise yet packed with information: main action, examples, format details, and usage guidance. Every sentence adds value without fluff. It is well-structured with front-loaded purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description should hint at return format. It mentions formats and that it returns content, but does not detail the structure of the returned data. However, given the simple fetch nature and the format enum providing clues, it is mostly complete. Could mention error handling or session state requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 33% (only 'url' has description). The description compensates by explaining the 'format' parameter options ('text', 'html', 'links') and their intended use. 'maxChars' is mentioned only by schema default without elaboration, but the overall parameter meaning is clear enough for usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool downloads any page from the virtual classroom using the active session and returns its content. It lists specific use cases (profiles, courses, forums) and distinguishes itself from sibling tools by stating it is for exploring things other tools don't cover.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to use this tool when the user wants to investigate something not covered by other tools or to discover IDs. It also notes the restriction to the host domain, providing clear context for when to use vs alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.