Skip to main content
Glama
Spacepal MCP Server

Spacepal MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Spacepal MCP Server

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for the Arc browser that enables programmatic management of spaces and tabs. It supports actions like listing, creating, and deleting spaces and tabs, as well as focusing spaces and opening URLs via AppleScript.
    9
    21 npm
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables inspection and control of Arc Browser spaces and tabs on macOS, including reading sidebar/history data and performing actions like focusing spaces, creating and closing tabs.
    13
    18 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Give AI agents deep control over macOS — windows, audio, Bluetooth, Spaces, Focus mode, and 200+ OS APIs — through one MCP server.
    35 npm
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides a local MCP bridge for AI assistants to control a Mac by observing screen state and performing actions like mouse movement, clicking, typing, and opening URLs.
    12
    MIT

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 19 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target distinct Space/window/profile actions, and descriptions explicitly distinguish close pairs such as switch_space vs set_up_space and apply_profile vs apply_template. A few boundaries still require careful reading, especially save/restore sessions vs save/restore window layouts and current_space vs list_spaces, but overlap is limited.

Naming Consistency4/5

Nearly all tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_spaces, move_window_to_space, apply_profile, restore_sessions). The main deviation is current_space, which is noun-like rather than verb-led; get_current_space would fit the convention better.

Tool Count3/5

The server exposes 19 tools, which is on the heavy side for a single MCP surface and includes plausible consolidation candidates such as profile vs template application and separate session/layout save-restore pairs. The domain is broad enough that most tools correspond to real workflows, but the count sits in the 16-25 range that tends to feel heavy.

Completeness4/5

Coverage is strong across Space lifecycle, window placement, layout/session restoration, profiles/templates, overview, and presentation mode. Minor gaps remain around creating/saving profiles, directly setting Space colours, and managing automations, but none appear fatal for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues