maxplus2-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to maxplus2-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local stdio-based MCP integration with InoProShop/CODESYS for project structure reading, POU editing with verified writes, compilation, task configuration, and persistent session recovery.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI to read, reliably edit, compile, and observe a local E5.95 EasyLanguage IDE over MCP, including project snapshots, declarations, native listview preparation, support-library metadata, and fault/variable capture. It works without simulating keyboard or mouse input and without depending on AutoLinker.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients on Windows to control the local mouse, keyboard, and screen understanding via MCP stdio, allowing automated workflows like viewing the screen, locating elements, clicking, typing, and verifying results.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying PCB and schematic data and driving DelphiScript automation in Altium Designer via MCP.139MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients such as Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Copilot to connect over MCP STDIO to CAD/CAE/CAM tooling for natural-language parametric shape synthesis, CSG script generation, solid watertightness validation, error analysis, and autonomous correction.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables read-only TwinCAT ADS diagnostics and symbol reads, offline PLC XML source-edit previews with diffs, and template-based Scope acquisition candidate generation over MCP stdio.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 68 tools
Descriptions are unusually explicit about boundaries and cross-reference sibling tools ('use gdf_geometry for...', 'use netlist_export for...'), which helps. However the surface has large overlapping clusters — e.g. gdf_text_edit vs gdf_text_format_edit (both edit free root DOC text), gdf_graphics_edit vs gdf_edit vs gdf_construct, and scf_edit vs scf_stimulus_edit vs scf_structure_edit — where an agent can easily pick the wrong one.
Everything is snake_case and grouped by predictable subsystem prefixes (gdf_, scf_, project_, desktop_, acf_, setacf_, maxplus2_, job_). But verb ordering is inconsistent: noun_verb forms (acf_read_pins, project_read_file, gdf_text_edit) coexist with verb_noun forms (list_projects, parse_tbl, simulate_and_verify, probe_executable), and many tools carry no prefix at all.
68 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single server. Even a rich legacy-EDA workflow does not justify this many entry points, and the count forces agents to navigate many near-duplicate edit/inspect variants rather than a focused set.
The surface covers the full lifecycle: project create/clone/files/read/write/search/parse, ACF read/validate/repair, setacf plan/apply, compile/simulate plan/run, result parsing, GDF/SYM/SCF authoring and editing, netlist export, waveform analysis, job control, and desktop GUI automation. Almost no obvious functional gap remains for the stated domain.