remove_business_user

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The verb 'Remove' implicitly signals a destructive operation, and the env var requirement provides useful context. However, with no annotations, the description does not disclose permissions, reversibility, or side effects, leaving some behavioral ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence conveys the action and the key prerequisite with no redundant words. Ideal conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description and schema together provide sufficient information to select and invoke the tool correctly. The env var requirement is a valuable contextual addition, though it could mention the source of user_id (e.g., from list_business_users) for extra clarity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter user_id is fully described in the schema (100% coverage), and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove') and the specific resource ('a user from the configured business'). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like add_business_user and list_business_users, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It identifies the core use case and notes a critical prerequisite (META_BUSINESS_ID env var). However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or when-not-to-use, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.