Skip to main content
Glama

esgpulse

Deliver AI-powered ESG and sustainability intelligence including CSRD compliance roadmaps, EU Taxonomy alignment, supply chain due diligence, emissions analysis, greenwashing risk detection, and ESG disclosure guidance.

Instructions

ESGPulse: AI-powered ESG and sustainability intelligence: CSRD compliance roadmaps, EU Taxonomy alignment, supply chain due diligence, emissions analysis, greenwashing risk, and ESG disclosure guidance. All end

Coverage: Global

Endpoints: • csrd ($0.10): CSRD compliance roadmap • framework ($0.10): ESG framework navigator • company ($0.10): Company ESG intelligence • emissions ($0.10): Carbon and emissions intelligence • sector ($0.10): SASB sector ESG materiality • taxonomy ($0.10): EU Taxonomy alignment check • supply-chain ($0.10): Supply chain ESG due diligence • score ($0.10): ESG score intelligence • greenwashing ($0.10): Greenwashing risk detector • disclosure ($0.10): ESG disclosure builder

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesWhich endpoint to call. Options: csrd | framework | company | emissions | sector | taxonomy | supply-chain | score | greenwashing | disclosure
langNoResponse language (ISO 639-1)
sectorNoIndustry sector (retail, manufacturing, financial-services, technology, energy, healthcare, etc.)
employeesNoNumber of employees (e.g. 500, 5000)
turnoverNoAnnual turnover in EUR (e.g. 250000000 for €250M)
jurisdictionNoCompany's primary jurisdiction
listedNoWhether the company is publicly listed
company_typeNoType of organization
goalNoPrimary reporting goal
companyNoCompany name (e.g. Apple, Unilever, HSBC)
focusNofocus
entityNoCompany or entity name (optional)
scopeNoscope
activityNoSpecific economic activity (e.g. solar energy generation, manufacture of cement)
objectiveNoEU Taxonomy environmental objective to assess
entity_typeNoentity_type
origin_countriesNoComma-separated list of sourcing countries (e.g. CN,BD,VN)
raterNorater
claimsNoSustainability claims to analyze (e.g. 'carbon neutral by 2030, eco-friendly packaging')
frameworkNoframework
topicNotopic
formatNoformat
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It mentions per-endpoint pricing ($0.10 each) but does not disclose authentication requirements, rate limits, output format, or data freshness. Behavioral traits beyond pricing are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with a header, coverage line, and bulleted endpoint list. However, it contains a truncated phrase ('All end') and the formatting appears messy. It is reasonably concise but not perfectly clean.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (22 parameters, 10 actions), the description provides a high-level overview of each endpoint but lacks guidance on which parameters are relevant per action, usage examples, or return value details. It is insufficient for effective tool selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds value by providing a one-line purpose for each endpoint (e.g., 'csrd: CSRD compliance roadmap') and noting global coverage. This enriches parameter understanding beyond the schema's basic enum descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that ESGPulse is an AI-powered ESG and sustainability intelligence tool, listing specific endpoints like CSRD compliance, EU Taxonomy alignment, and emissions analysis. It effectively communicates the domain and scope, though it lacks a strong action verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the many sibling pulse tools (e.g., alphapulse, climatepulse). The description lists endpoints but does not offer context for selecting ESGPulse over alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GTCC777/pulsenetwork-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server