Skip to main content
Glama
GOLayerone

layerone-mcp

Official
by GOLayerone

Sign — Envoyer un document à signer

sign_send_for_signature

Send a PDF for electronic signature with eIDAS/PAdES compliance. Creates a signature request and emails an invitation to the signer.

Instructions

Envoie un PDF à signer électroniquement (eIDAS / PAdES). Crée la demande et envoie l'email d'invitation au signataire. Le PDF est fourni encodé en base64.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pdf_base64YesContenu du document PDF encodé en base64.
document_nameYesNom du document.
signer_emailYesEmail du signataire.
signer_nameYesNom du signataire.
signer_roleNoRôle du signataire (défaut : Client).
signer_phoneNoTéléphone du signataire au format international (+33…), requis seulement pour l'OTP SMS.
noteNoMessage d'accompagnement adressé au signataire.
expiry_daysNoDélai d'expiration de la demande en jours (défaut : 30).
company_nameNoNom de la société affichée au signataire.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It discloses the action (send PDF, create request, send email) but omits details like return values, side effects, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loading the core action without any extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, and the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., a request ID), leaving the agent uncertain about the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description only reiterates that the PDF is base64 encoded, adding no additional meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sends a PDF for electronic signature, creates the request, and sends an invitation email, distinguishing it from other sign-related sibling tools like cancellation or status checks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for initiating signature requests but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sign_detect_fields or sign_cancel_document.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GOLayerone/layerone-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server