DocX — Télécharger une version de modèle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses it returns a summary (size + truncated base64 preview) rather than full file, which is useful behavioral info. However, no annotations exist, and it could clarify if the actual file download is available or only the summary. Lacks details on auth or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler, front-loaded with main action, second sentence adds return info. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description explains return value (summary). Sibling tools provide context. Missing error cases or prerequisites, but sufficient for core functionality.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with basic descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond 'ID du modèle' and 'ID numérique de la version archivée', which are already in schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb 'Télécharge' and resource '.docx d'une version archivée d'un modèle', distinguishing it from siblings like docx_download_template (current version) and docx_restore_template_version (restores instead).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied (get archived version file), but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor mention of alternatives like docx_download_template for current version.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.