DocX — Supprimer un modèle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description clearly states the permanent deletion and irreversibility, which is appropriate for a destructive tool. With no annotations provided, the description effectively conveys the behavioral impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences deliver key information with no waste. The irreversibility warning is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description fully covers the action, effects, and implications.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents the 'template_id' parameter (100% coverage). The description adds value by explaining that deletion includes the version history, providing context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Supprime') and resource ('modèle'), and clearly distinguishes the tool from siblings as the only deletion tool among docx operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the irreversibility warning implies caution, there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or prerequisites. Usage is implied but lacks explicit when-not-to-use context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.