Get Financials

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description covers the data returned but does not disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, authentication requirements, or error handling for missing businesses.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single concise sentence with no redundancy, efficiently communicating the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter tool with output schema, description adequately covers purpose and included data. Missing default behavior mention but schema fills gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers both parameters with descriptions and enums. Description adds 'revenue, expenses, and milestones', reinforcing section choices but not adding new semantic value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb (Get), resource (financial data), and specific businesses (Codaissance or TamperTantrum Labs). It distinguishes from sibling tools by specifying the exact data scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implies usage context (retrieving financial data for the two businesses) but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other 'get' tools or what not to use it for.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.