reviseTasks
Revise existing tasks by specifying a task ID and a prompt with changes.
Instructions
Revise tasks
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fromTaskId | Yes | ||
| prompt | Yes |
Revise existing tasks by specifying a task ID and a prompt with changes.
Revise tasks
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fromTaskId | Yes | ||
| prompt | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions needed, or limits. It merely restates the tool name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (two words) but fails to provide necessary information, making it under-specified rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and zero parameter documentation, the description is completely inadequate for an AI agent to understand or use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no explanation for the parameters fromTaskId and prompt. Their meaning and format are entirely unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Revise tasks' is vague; 'revise' could mean modify, update, or restructure, and it does not distinguish from sibling tools like updateTask or expandTask.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as updateTask or addTask. There is no context about prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FutureAtoms/agentic-control-framework'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server