removeTask
Remove a task using its unique ID. Deletes the specified task from the task management system.
Instructions
Remove task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Remove a task using its unique ID. Deletes the specified task from the task management system.
Remove task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not specify whether the removal is permanent, soft-delete, or requires permissions. This is a critical gap for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is only two words but is not concise in a helpful sense; it omits essential information. Every sentence should earn its place; here the single sentence is insufficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, and the presence of many sibling task tools, the description is severely incomplete. The agent cannot understand the tool's role, impact, or usage without additional context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no meaning to the 'id' parameter. It fails to explain the format, source, or additional context beyond the schema's type and required constraint.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Remove task' merely restates the tool name. It provides no verb specificity or differentiation from sibling tools like 'updateTask' or 'deprioritize_task', failing to clarify the exact scope or effect.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or whether this action is reversible, leaving the agent without decision criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FutureAtoms/agentic-control-framework'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server