listTasks
Retrieve all tasks with optional status filtering and format selection to organize your workflow.
Instructions
List tasks
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No | ||
| format | No |
Retrieve all tasks with optional status filtering and format selection to organize your workflow.
List tasks
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No | ||
| format | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description must disclose behavior. It does not mention whether listing includes all tasks, pagination, sorting, permissions, or side effects. Completely insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short but not usefully concise. It omits critical detail, so it is under-specified rather than efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 2 undocumented parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and many sibling tools, the description fails to provide necessary context for correct invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning for the two parameters (status, format). An agent cannot infer valid values or purpose.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'List tasks' is a tautology of the name, providing no additional detail about what tasks are listed (e.g., all tasks, filtered, scope) and fails to distinguish from sibling tools like addTask or updateTask.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus other task-related siblings. An agent has no context to decide between listTasks and alternatives such as getNextTask or expandTask.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FutureAtoms/agentic-control-framework'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server