知乎
zhihuGet trending topics from Zhihu. Use limit to set result count and noCache to bypass cache.
Instructions
获取知乎热榜数据
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| noCache | No |
zhihuGet trending topics from Zhihu. Use limit to set result count and noCache to bypass cache.
获取知乎热榜数据
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| noCache | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavior. It does not mention whether the tool is read-only, if it uses caching, or any side effects. The agent cannot infer safety or constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but at the cost of essential information. The single sentence lacks structure and fails to provide meaningful guidance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, no annotations, and minimal description, the tool definition is incomplete. The agent lacks understanding of return values, parameter effects, and usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameters ('limit', 'noCache'). The agent must guess their meaning and usage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (获取, get) and resource (知乎热榜数据, Zhihu hot list data), and distinguishes it from siblings by naming the platform. However, it lacks any additional context such as data scope or format.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool over siblings or when not to use it. Given many similar hot list tools, this omission reduces clarity for the agent.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FrankXMX/dailyhotmcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server