微博
weiboFetch trending topics from Weibo's hot search list. Use limit to set the number of items and noCache to bypass caching.
Instructions
获取微博热搜榜数据
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| noCache | No |
weiboFetch trending topics from Weibo's hot search list. Use limit to set the number of items and noCache to bypass caching.
获取微博热搜榜数据
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| noCache | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose caching, rate limits, or other behavioral traits beyond the basic retrieval action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary details; it is not overly verbose but could be more informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and minimal description fail to provide enough information for an agent to use the tool effectively, especially with two undocumented parameters.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the meaning or usage of 'limit' or 'noCache', leaving them entirely unspecified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('get') and the resource ('Weibo hot search list data'), distinguishing it from sibling tools that target different platforms.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bilibili or zhihu; lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/FrankXMX/dailyhotmcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server