酷安

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It only states it gets hot list data, but omits caching, pagination, rate limits, or authentication needs. Insufficient for a tool with no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short (one phrase), which is concise but at the expense of necessary detail. Lacks structure and any additional context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 2 parameters, no output schema, no annotations. Description fails to cover return format, error handling, or behavior. Completely inadequate for proper usage guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and description adds no parameter info. 'limit' and 'noCache' are unexplained, leaving the agent to guess their meaning and usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description '获取酷安热榜数据' clearly states verb (获取/get) and resource (酷安热榜数据/Coolapk hot list data). Specifically identifies the platform, distinguishing it from many sibling tools that cover other platforms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by platform name and sibling context: use this tool for Coolapk data. No explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives. Minimal guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.