ibmcloud_cf_routes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'List' which implies a read operation, but there is no explicit statement about read-only behavior, required target context (e.g., org/space), or output format. The sparse description leaves critical behavioral aspects undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with a single, clear sentence. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool, though it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, no parameters, and no output schema, the description should provide more context about the scope (e.g., which Cloud Foundry space is used), any prerequisites like logging in or targeting, and what the returned data contains. The current description is too minimal to be fully useful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (empty schema). Per the scoring rubric, a baseline of 4 is appropriate since there are no parameters to describe. The description adds no parameter-related information, but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the primary action ('List') and the resource ('Cloud Foundry routes'), which is specific enough to understand the tool's function. However, it does not differentiate from other list tools like ibmcloud_cf_apps or ibmcloud_cf_orgs beyond the distinct resource name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, target selection, or exclusions, leaving the agent without context for selecting this tool among many similar listing tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.