ibmcloud_cf_apps

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'List', which implies a read-only operation, but does not mention what data is returned, whether it requires a targeted Cloud Foundry org/space, or any pagination or sorting behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no wasted words. It is immediately accessible and does not repeat any structured information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple zero-parameter list tool, the description provides a minimal level of completeness. However, it lacks context about operating within a Cloud Foundry org/space or how the result set is scoped, which is relevant given the broader IBM Cloud toolset.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% (vacuously). The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and the description correctly implies there are no configuration options.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and the resource ('Cloud Foundry applications'), making the tool's purpose obvious. It does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling 'ibmcloud_cf_app' (singular), but the plural form and clear verb provide adequate clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'ibmcloud_cf_app' for individual app details or 'ibmcloud_cf_orgs' or 'ibmcloud_cf_spaces' for broader context. There is no mention of prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.