Skip to main content
Glama
Engr-FaizanAli

io.github.Engr-FaizanAli/text-to-speech

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.Engr-FaizanAli/text-to-speech

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that provides offline text-to-speech via native OS speech engines. It allows AI assistants to speak task summaries instantly with no network calls.
      -
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes speech-to-text and text-to-speech capabilities using a local speaches instance, allowing AI assistants to transcribe audio and generate speech.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A text-to-speech MCP server that enables AI assistants to speak using the VOICEVOX engine with support for multi-character conversations. It features queue management, low-latency streaming via FFplay, and cross-platform playback across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
      7
      149 npm
      16
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that converts text into lifelike speech using Microsoft Edge's Text-to-Speech service, supporting customizable voice, rate, volume, and pitch.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that integrates high-quality text-to-speech capabilities with Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients, supporting multiple voice options and audio formats.
      15 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The purpose of speak_text is singular and clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('speak' + 'text'), which is consistent and intuitive. With only one tool, there are no mixed conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has exactly one tool, which feels thin for a text-to-speech service. While it covers the core action, users might expect additional tools for voice configuration or listing available options.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool provides the fundamental speak action but lacks obvious capabilities like voice selection, speed adjustment, or cancellation. This leaves notable gaps for a complete TTS workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues