speaches-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@speaches-mcptranscribe the audio at /tmp/recording.mp3"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
speaches-mcp
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes speaches as transcribe_audio and text_to_speech tools.
Speaches is a local, OpenAI API-compatible server for speech-to-text (via faster-whisper) and text-to-speech (via Kokoro/Piper). This MCP server lets AI assistants like Claude use it directly.
Tools
transcribe_audio
Transcribe an audio file using your speaches instance.
Parameter | Required | Description |
| ✅ | Absolute path to the audio file |
| ❌ | ISO-639-1 language code (e.g. |
| ❌ | Whisper model ID. Defaults to |
text_to_speech
Convert text to speech and save to a file.
Parameter | Required | Description |
| ✅ | Text to convert |
| ✅ | Absolute path for the output audio file (e.g. |
| ❌ | Voice ID. Defaults to |
| ❌ | TTS model ID. Defaults to |
Usage
With Docker + Supergateway (SSE transport)
This exposes the MCP server over SSE on port 8010, suitable for remote clients.
docker compose up --buildThen connect your MCP client to http://localhost:8010/sse.
Standalone (stdio transport)
Build the image:
docker build -t speaches-mcp .Run it:
docker run --rm -i \
-e SPEACHES_URL=http://your-speaches-host:8000 \
speaches-mcpFor Claude Desktop, add to your config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"speaches": {
"command": "docker",
"args": ["run", "--rm", "-i",
"-e", "SPEACHES_URL=http://your-speaches-host:8000",
"speaches-mcp"
]
}
}
}Environment Variables
Variable | Default | Description |
|
| Base URL of your speaches instance |
|
| Default speech-to-text model |
|
| Default text-to-speech model |
|
| Default TTS voice |
|
| Required by the OpenAI SDK but not used by speaches |
Downloading Models
Before transcribing, make sure you've downloaded models into speaches:
# Speech-to-text
curl http://your-speaches-host:8000/v1/models/Systran/faster-whisper-large-v3 -X POST
# Text-to-speech
curl http://your-speaches-host:8000/v1/models/speaches-ai/Kokoro-82M-v1.0-ONNX -X POSTLicense
MIT
Available Tools
2 toolstext_to_speechD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | Text to convert to speech | |
| output_path | Yes | Absolute path to write the output audio file (e.g. /tmp/output.mp3) | |
| voice | No | Voice ID to use. Defaults to af_heart | |
| model | No | TTS model ID to use. Defaults to speaches-ai/Kokoro-82M-v1.0-ONNX |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
transcribe_audioD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | Yes | Absolute path to the audio file to transcribe | |
| language | No | ISO-639-1 language code, e.g. 'en', 'fr'. Omit for auto-detect. | |
| model | No | Whisper model ID to use. Defaults to Systran/faster-whisper-large-v3 |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: text_to_speech converts text to audio, and transcribe_audio converts audio to text. There is no overlap.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using underscores, making them predictable and easy to understand.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a speech processing domain, where additional tools for voice management or language selection might be expected.
The core operations of text-to-speech and transcription are covered, but missing features like voice listing or parameter configuration create minor gaps.
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Speech-to-Text
MCP server exposing the AceDataCloud Fish Audio API (text-to-speech with voice conditioning)
MCP server for Text-to-Speech
AI voice generation: text-to-speech and voice cloning from any MCP client.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/xavier-hernandez/mcp-speaches'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server