delete_channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., whether the operation is reversible, permission requirements, impact on messages or threads). The agent receives no insight into side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (one clause), which is concise but not appropriately sized—it lacks sufficient information to guide correct usage. It is front-loaded but under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the simple tool shape (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description fails to cover essential context like the channel's type (text, voice, etc.), deletion prerequisites, or whether archived channels can be deleted. The tool is left ambiguous.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the channel_id parameter (e.g., format, source, or validity constraints). The agent must rely solely on the schema, which only lists the parameter without semantic context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a channel' restates the tool name verbatim, providing no additional context or differentiation from sibling tools like edit_channel or create_channel. It lacks specificity about scope or prerequisites.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., edit_channel for modifications, or other deletion tools). No prerequisites or post-conditions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.