add_member_role
Assign a role to a server member by specifying the guild, user, and role IDs.
Instructions
Assign a role to a guild member.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | ||
| user_id | Yes | ||
| guild_id | Yes |
Assign a role to a server member by specifying the guild, user, and role IDs.
Assign a role to a guild member.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | ||
| user_id | Yes | ||
| guild_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action without mentioning required permissions, idempotency, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence), but given the lack of detail, it borders on under-specification. It is not verbose but fails to provide needed information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no output schema and many siblings, the description is too sparse. It does not explain return values or behavior, making it incomplete for effective tool selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names. Without compensation, an agent has no additional context for the parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (assign) and the target (a role to a guild member). It is specific and distinct from sibling tools like create_role or remove_member_role.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as add_reaction or create_role. The description does not differentiate context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/EncryptMan/discord-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server